New Politics, Vol. X, No. 1, Whole Number 37
Iraq: The Case for Immediate U.S. Withdrawal, Joanne Landy
In Defense of Tactical Voting (Sometimes), Stephen R. Shalom
The Dead-End of Lesser-Evilism, Thomas Harrison
Left Politics and Posturing in the Presidential Race, Michael Hirsch
Special Section on Civil Liberties
The State of Our Civil Liberties: A Post-9/11 Health Check, Nancy Murray
NP Interview with Anthony Romero, Executive Director of the ACLU, Kent Worcester and Mark Dow
Roundups, Detentions, and Other Phantoms of Lost Liberty, Mark Dow
Reflections of an Immigration Attorney, Abira Ashfaq
Concerning a Small Matter of Definition, C. Douglas Lummis
U.S. Libraries and the “War on Terrorism”, Mark Hudson
Liberty vs. Security? Lessons from the First Red Scare, Bonnie Honig
Historians, Repression, and the Iraq War, Jesse Lemisch
The New Unity Partnership, Herman Benson
Reclaiming Democracy: A Lesson from Zanon, Ann Scholl and Facundo Arrizabalaga
Revisiting Foucault and the Iranian Revolution, Janet Afary and Kevin Anderson
What is Plutocracy?, Rossen Vassilev
The CP and CIO – 1, Peter Drucker
The CP and CIO – 2, Joe Gladstone
Reply to Drucker and Gladstone, Nelson Lichtenstein
The Bolsheviks, Bennett Muraskin
Reply to Bennett Muraskin, Ernest Erber
Book and Film Reviews
Policy Shifts, David Cunningham
A Dangerous Ingnorance, Marc Karson
Leadership Matters, Michael Wreszin
Multiculturalism and Science, Mel Bienenfeld
Diminishing Welfare: A Review Essay, Betty Reid Mandell
In the Shadow of Cairns, Lev Lafayette
Fight What Power?, Brian Keizer
A Two-Fisted Critique, Martin Comack
The Passion of Robert McNamara, or Sympathy for the Devil?, Kurt Jacobsen
Words and Pictures: Carlo, Jon Bloom
In this issue:
IT'S HARD TO SEE HOW the Bush administration is going to win the war in Iraq. Despite all the official bravado, a cloud of doom is descending on the White House, and with good reason: international outrage is mounting at U.S. behavior at Abu Ghraib prison and throughout Iraq, more and more Americans are concluding that the war is going badly, and Iraq is proving uncontrollable with reports, in May, that only 35 percent of Iraqis want U.S.
The November election poses a dilemma for leftists. Both major parties embrace the agenda of corporate America. Neither challenges the assumptions of American empire, and politics as usual will be followed by a Washington regime that . . .
Read more ›
The November election poses a dilemma for leftists. Both major parties embrace the agenda of corporate America. Neither challenges the assumptions of American empire, and politics as usual will be followed by a Washington regime that will be at best agnostic toward the needs of progressive social movements if not hostile to it. Against this, Ralph Nader is again launching a crusade against both parties.
he November election poses a dilemma for leftists. Both major parties embrace the agenda of corporate America. Neither challenges the assumptions of American empire, and politics as usual will be followed by a Washington regime that will be at best agnostic toward the needs of progressive social movements if not hostile to it. Against this, Ralph Nader is again launching a crusade against both parties.
This is a lightly edited transcript of an interview conducted by Mark Dow and Kent Worcester with Anthony Romero in April 2004 in his lower Manhattan office.
New Politics: Yesterday during the September 11 Commission hearings, when he was defending some of the Patriot Act measures that have been criticized, Ashcroft said that a lot of what the Patriot Act did was simply to extend measures that were already in existence.
Anthony Romero: Patently false.
In an Alabama district court a few years ago, the Department of Justice made an argument familiar to those who have read immigration cases: it asked the court to keep its hands off. The department argued for what I call "double deference." First, the court should defer to the executive and legislative branches as a matter of course in immigration matters; and second, the court should defer to the jail where the plaintiff was being incarcerated since prison administrators need wide latitude in operating their lock-ups.
In the days and weeks following the September 11, 2001 Al-Qaeda terrorist attacks in the northeastern United States, there was a sudden proliferation of U.S. flags and other patriotic imagery in public libraries across the nation. U.S. public libraries have traditionally displayed U.S. flags inside or atop their buildings, even though they are financed by local and state tax money and receive little if any federal funding. But the new patriotic décor went well beyond any simple statement of solidarity with the nation in a time of crisis.
What John Sweeney did unto Lane Kirkland in 1995 may now be done unto him. On September 18, this year, Sweeney announced he would run for reelection as AFL-CIO president, along with Rich Trumka, secretary-treasurer, and Linda Chavez-Thompson, executive vice-president. But his term of office doesn't expire until mid 2005, almost two years to go.
February 2004 marked the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Iranian Revolution. From September 1978 to February 1979, in the course of a massive urban revolution with millions of participants, the Iranian people toppled the regime of Muhammad Reza Shah Pahlavi (1941-1979), which had pursued a highly authoritarian program of economic and cultural modernization. By late 1978, the Islamist faction led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini had come to dominate the antiregime uprising, in which secular nationalists, democrats, and leftists also participated.
Multiculturalism has become mainstream. Across North America and Europe, school curricula are checked for accurate representation of non-Western and non-white cultures. Research examining the culturally conditioned character of all aspects of knowledge has not only gained a hearing in academic journals, but has sometimes been integrated into popular textbooks from kindergarten on up.